Legal Requirements Related to Accessible Technology
As awareness of disability issues has grown over the last few decades, so too
have the laws governing the rights of people with disabilities. This section gives
you an overview of some of the primary Federal laws that apply to the accessibility
of information and telecommunication technologies, including:
Note: Many states have passed laws pertaining to the accessibility of
technology. You can find an overview of the states’ accessibility-related laws, policies
and standards at
http://www.ittatc.org/laws/stateLawAtGlance.php, or you can contact the
local Protection and Advocacy organization (www.napas.org)
in a specific state to learn more about what that state requires of technology.
CAUTION: The following section is for informational purposes only. ITTATC does
not provide legal advice. If you need legal assistance or advice on your specific situation,
please contact an attorney.
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (with amendments in 1998) prohibits
discrimination based on disability in Federal employment and federally funded programs and
services, by Federal contractors, and in the availability and use of Federal agencies’ electronic
and information technology.
In particular, Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires that when Federal
departments and agencies procure, develop, maintain or use electronic and information technology
(EIT), they must ensure that they comply with the
accessibility standards developed by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board
(Access Board), unless doing so would pose an undue burden on
those Federal departments or agencies. The purpose of the law is to ensure that Federal employees and members
of the public with disabilities have access to the same information and technologies as employees and members
of the public without disabilities.
Products and services that are covered by Section 508:
- Computer hardware and software
- Telecommunications products, such as telephones and pagers
- Information kiosks and transaction machines, such as ticket transaction machines
- World Wide Web sites, including both intranet and internet information and applications
- Multimedia, such as instructional videos and Flash animations
- Office equipment, such as copiers and fax machines
Some important "fine print":
- Section 508 applies to Federal departments and agencies including the U.S. Postal Service.
In addition, contractors providing services or products to Federal agencies must make sure that
the products and services that they provide to the Federal government are compliant with
Section 508.
- Section 508 requirements cover all electronic and information technology (EIT) that is
procured, developed, used and maintained by the Federal government. Only those products
that were purchased after June 21, 2001, however, are "enforceable" via the
complaint procedure.
- There are certain situations in which Section 508 does not apply. Agencies are not required
to acquire EIT that meets the technical provisions of the accessibility standards if the
acquisition: (a) is a micro-purchase made prior to April 1, 2005; (b) is for a national
security system; (c) is acquired by a contractor incidental to a contract; (d) is located
in spaces frequented only by service personnel for maintenance, repair, or occasional
monitoring of equipment; or (e) would impose an undue burden on the agency.
- If a Federal agency determines that it would pose an undue burden to comply with the
Section 508 standards, it must still provide information and data to individuals with
disabilities through an alternative means of access that can be used by the individuals.
Alternative means may include, but are not limited to: voice, fax, relay service, TTY,
qualified sign language interpreters, Internet posting, captioning, text-to-speech synthesis,
readers, personal assistants, or audio descriptions.
- The Federal agency that purchases the EIT is responsible for ensuring that the
technology conforms to the 508 standards. The standards and Federal Acquisition
Regulations can be found at
http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Content&ID=3>.
- Individuals with disabilities may file a complaint with an agency or bring a civil
action in Federal Court for an agency's noncompliance with the requirements of Section 508.
If you are interested in learning more about Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act, check out these resources:
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was the first major overhaul of American
telecommunications policy in nearly 62 years. This Act added a provision, Section 255,
to the Communications Act of 1934, and this section focuses on access to
telecommunications products by individuals with disabilities.
Specifically, Section 255 of the Communications Act contains three primary
components: accessibility, compatibility, and usability. First,
the law requires companies to make their telecommunications products and services
accessible to people with disabilities, if readily achievable. Where it is
not readily achievable to provide access, Section 255 requires manufacturers and service
providers to make their devices and services compatible with peripheral devices
and specialized customer premises equipment that are commonly used by people with
disabilities, if readily achievable. Examples of such devices are TTYs and assistive
listening devices. Section 255 also requires companies to make their products and
services usable by providing product information, instructional manuals, and
technical support to enable people with disabilities to effectively use those products
and services.
Readily achievable is defined as easily accomplishable, without much difficulty or
expense. In determining what is readily achievable, companies must balance the costs
and nature of the access required with their available resources. Companies that have
great resources will need to do more to achieve access than will companies with smaller
budgets. The FCC makes readily achievable determinations on a case-by-case basis.
Products and services that are covered by Section 255:
- Telecommunications equipment including, but not limited to, telephones (both wireless
and cordless), fax machines, answering machines, and pagers
- Telecommunications services including, but not limited to, regular telephone calls,
call waiting, speed dialing, call forwarding, computer-provided directory assistance,
call monitoring, caller identification, call tracing, and repeat dialing
- Two types of information services: voice mail systems and interactive voice
response (IVR) systems
Some important "fine print":
- The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for implementation of Section 255.
- The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board)
issued final guidelines for accessibility, usability, and compatibility of
telecommunications equipment and customer premises equipment covered by Section
255 of the Communications Act. The accessibility guidelines can be found at
http://www.access-board.gov/telecomm/html/telfinal.htm.
- Section 255 does not permit consumers to sue companies in the courts;
to complain, consumers must file an informal or formal complaint with the FCC.
If you are interested in learning more about Section 255 of the
Communications Act, check out these resources:
The Hearing Aid Compatibility Act (HAC Act) of 1988 requires all wireline
and cordless telephones manufactured or imported for use in the United States to be
compatible with hearing aids. This Act built upon the Telecommunications for the
Disabled Act of 1982, which directed the FCC to establish uniform technical standards
for hearing aid compatibility. The HAC Act also requires all wireline and cordless
phones to be equipped with volume control. In addition, the FCC has ruled that certain
wireless phones must be built with features that are compatible with hearing aids and
cochlear implants over time, although there are no mandates for volume control in
wireless phones.
Products and services that are covered by the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act:
- Wireline telephones, including cordless telephones
- Certain wireless telephones after 2005
Some important "fine print":
- All wireline and cordless telephones must have volume control and internal parts
that are compatible with hearing aids. Typically, this means that these telephones
must have enough magnetic leakage to allow a hearing aid wearer to turn off the volume
on the aid, and instead use the aid's telecoil to receive sound. In 2003, the FCC
issued rules that phase in these HAC requirements to certain digital wireless
telephones. In addition, the FCC rules phase in requirements for certain digital
wireless phones to reduce interference caused by electromagnetic frequencies.
- The FCC's rules require the following for each type of digital transmission
(GSM, CDMA, TDMA, iDEN): (1) By 2005, digital manufacturers must make available
at least 2 digital phones with reduced interference; (2) By 2005, nationwide digital
carriers must make available either 2 telephones or 25% of the total number of models
they offer with reduced interference; and (3) By 2006, digital manufacturers and
carriers must provide at least 2 digital telephones with telecoil capability.
- Under the HAC Act, the FCC does not require digital phones to have volume
control, although most wireless telephones already provide this feature.
If you are interested in learning more about the HAC Act, check out these resources:
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) is a comprehensive act involving the
administration of Federal elections, voting machines, polling places, voter registration,
and other areas. Included within HAVA are provisions related to the accessibility
of polling places and voting machines. These provisions are intended to promote full
participation in the electoral process for persons with disabilities. HAVA builds on
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly
and Handicapped Act (VAEHA) to enable persons with disabilities to more readily
participate in the electoral process, and to vote independently and privately. HAVA
was signed into law on October 29, 2002, and its provisions will take effect over time,
with the final milestone occurring on January 1, 2006. Each state is responsible for
developing complaint procedures related to HAVA violations, and most of them are still
in development. ITTATC will continue to monitor the states’ progress and provide updates
as complaint processes are defined. Check www.ittatc.org
regularly for more information on implementation of HAVA and its impact on accessible voting.
If you are interested in learning more about HAVA, check out these resources:
Learning More
If you want to learn more about the laws pertaining to disability rights, check out these resources: